Your engineers should be engineering
AI systems that automate reporting, compliance monitoring, and inspection analysis, embedded in the tools your team already uses. Prove value in weeks, not quarters.
70%
time reduction
48hrs
to first insights
90 days
to production system
60%
of your senior engineers' time is spent assembling reports. Not engineering.
The expertise your team built over decades lives in their heads, not in your systems.
Every report starts from scratch. Every project reinvents the process.
TRI submissions require weeks of cross-referencing production records, site plans, MSDS sheets, and waste manifests against emissions data. Regulatory changes across jurisdictions get caught late, or not at all. Inspection reports depend on whoever writes them, with no consistency across teams or projects.
How we build production AI for AEC
We build systems that handle the specific, regulated workflows your engineers deal with every day.
Built by engineers with domain expertise
Our teams include environmental engineers, data scientists, and AI architects who understand EPA reporting requirements, multi-jurisdictional compliance, and infrastructure assessment standards.
Embedded in your existing tools
Reports generate in Microsoft Word. Compliance alerts surface in Outlook and Teams. Data extraction works across PDFs, spreadsheets, and images. Your team doesn’t learn a new platform.
Your IP. Your data. Your rules.
Every system we build runs on your infrastructure, with your data governance policies enforced. Open-source core, no vendor lock-in. Full audit trail for every output.
How it works
48-hour proof
Upload your most recent TRI dataset, inspection records, or compliance documentation. Within 48 hours, see data inconsistencies your team missed and a first-draft report from your existing data.
90-day lighthouse
One report type. One jurisdiction. One project portfolio. Over 90 days, the system goes into production on a real workflow with real submissions.
Scale
Expand across report types, jurisdictions, and project portfolios. What the system learned on TRI reporting informs how it handles state-level compliance.
See what your data already knows
Book a ConsultationThree systems we build for AEC
Environmental reporting intelligence
Ingests production records, site plans, MSDS sheets, and waste manifests, then cross-references against emissions data to generate EPA-compliant reports.
Regulatory compliance intelligence
Monitors federal, state, and local regulatory updates across every jurisdiction. Maps changes to your active projects and generates compliance briefs.
Inspection and assessment intelligence
Analyzes multi-modal inspection data: photos, drone imagery, sensor readings. Detects anomalies, compares against historical baselines, and generates standardized reports.
What the system learns
Every report, every compliance cycle, every inspection teaches the system more about how your firm operates.
Data sources connected and normalized. Report builder generates first-pass TRI submissions requiring significant engineer editing. Compliance monitor handles basic regulatory tracking.
Output matches your firm's terminology and formatting. Compliance briefs anticipate regulatory impacts. Inspection reports generate with historical trend analysis.
Reports need only light review. Compliance engine catches regulatory shifts before your team does. Inspection analysis flags accelerated deterioration automatically.
Institutional memory for your engineering organization. New hires onboard with full project context. Knowledge stays when people leave or retire.
Illustrative example — actual timelines and outcomes vary by engagement.
TRI reporting compressed from three weeks to three hours
A mid-size environmental consultancy moved from a three-week manual cycle to same-day draft generation. First-pass accuracy exceeded 90%.
Compliance impact assessments within 24 hours of regulatory changes
A national firm operating across 14 states automated multi-jurisdictional monitoring. Two projects avoided costly mid-stream scope changes.
Field-to-assessment time reduced by 70% across 40+ engineers
An infrastructure consultancy standardized inspection output across its entire field engineering team. Historical comparison flagged three accelerated deterioration patterns.
From the field
See all
Why most enterprise AI dies between the demo and the org chart
Gartner expects 40% of agentic AI projects to be canceled before 2027. The failure mode is almost always the same, and it has nothing to do with the technology.
Read article
Rented intelligence vs. owned intelligence
If you turned off all your AI tools tomorrow, what institutional knowledge would you lose? For most organizations, the answer is nothing. That’s rented intelligence.
Read articleEnterprise ready
SOC 2 Type II certified
Annual third-party audit. Controls verified across security, availability, and confidentiality.
Your infrastructure, your rules
Deploy on your cloud environment or on-premise. Data never leaves your approved infrastructure.
Role-based access controls
Granular permissions by project, facility, jurisdiction, and team.
Complete audit trail
Every report, extraction, and compliance flag logged with timestamp, source reference, and user attribution.
Data residency options
Configurable data residency to meet federal, state, and client-specific requirements.
Secure integrations
Encrypted API connections to your existing document management and field data platforms. No open endpoints.
Your engineers have better things to do
If your senior technical staff is spending more time assembling reports than solving engineering problems, that's a capacity problem with a system-level solution. Start with a 48-hour proof using your own data.
FAQ
Each deployment is configured to your firm's jurisdictional footprint with separate regulatory rulesets. When you expand, the system ingests new requirements within the first cycle.
The system generates submission-ready output with a human review step before submission. Your senior engineer handles final technical review and sign-off.
PDFs, Excel, Word, scanned images via OCR, CSV from lab systems, field data from mobile apps, drone imagery, and sensor data feeds.
The compliance engine monitors continuously. When a change is published, it maps against your active projects and generates a compliance impact brief within 24 hours.
Cycle 1 requires moderate editing. By cycle 3-4, light review only. By cycle 6-8, senior engineers describe their role as exception handling and strategic review.
Yes. Firms that start with TRI typically expand to stormwater reporting, Phase I/II ESAs, or NEPA documentation within the first year.
All data stays on your approved infrastructure. We support air-gapped deployments for classified work with role-based access controls.
The 48-hour proof is free. The 90-day lighthouse is fixed-scope with known cost. After that, a subscription model based on report volume and scope.
Every output includes full source attribution. Your engineer can trace any value to its source in seconds. Automated consistency checks flag confidence levels before output.
Generic AI can summarize text. It can't ingest your TRI dataset, cross-reference against MSDS sheets and emissions data, validate against EPA requirements, and produce a submission-ready Form R in your format.